Wednesday, 24 June 2009
Last Chance Harvey
The very definition of "nice", Last Chance Harvey provides an ideal opportunity for a wallow in wish fulfillment and first-rate acting. Emma Thompson reminds us why we should actually see far more of her on the big screen, while Dustin Hoffman manfully copes with being dwarfed by his co-star (on several occasions, she even has to wear high heels, thus emphasising the difference further) Screw-up Harry learns that family is more important than a job he doesn't enjoy, while Kate learns to take a chance on life. There's nothing earth-shattering about it but ther are worse ways to spend 90 minutes.
Tuesday, 23 June 2009
Fermat's Room
Fermat's Room sprints along at such a pace that the viewer has no time to fret about potential plot holes (with a story as complex as this, logic says there *must* be some!), never mind trying to work out the mathematical puzzles the characters have to solve to prevent the walls of the eponymous room crushing them to death. In fact, the first instinct upon reaching the end of the film is to re-watch it, preferably with a pause button to hand.
The credits sequence slyly sets up the mystery as a gloved hand constructs a miniature room, subsequently revealed to be the room where the 4 mathematicians will be trapped. There's something unnerving about the sequence and it prepares us for the mystery to come: who? why? In fact, most of the first half masterfully succeeds in misdirecting both characters and audience about precisely these questions. One of the mathematicians appears to be the obvious target while another the equally obvious mastermind, but this is a film that enjoys playing games and nothing should be taken at face value.
The pseudonyms the characters adopt might be those of mathematicians, and the puzzles might be mathematical in nature, but the narrative is never ponderous. It's a smart film that wears it's cleverness lightly. If anything, the film is perhaps just a little too frenetic, especially during the denouement when the revelations come thick and fast and it's difficult to work out just what's truth and what's a lie. The initial question appears to be what links the 4 characters with the mysterious "Fermat" but it turns out it's not as simple as that. Inconsequential events have huge importance with the advantage of hindsight and it's the ability to correctly interpret them that proves vital. In that regard, it's natural that it should be "Pascal" (inventor of a popcorn-spouting duck, who initially struggled to solve to entrance puzzle and is battling with a drink problem) who can see most clearly. His practical mind hones in on the essentials at important moments - he's the one who first notices the walls closing in, as well as working out who's responsible. You can practically see him thinking things through. In many ways, he's the most sympathetic of the characters, with his self-inflicted penance for one tragic mistake. Only "Fermat" has a similar poignancy. The others are far too obsessed with the appeal of mathematics and fame (the true reason for their predicament) to connect in the same way. It's therefore satisfying that it's "Pascal" who has the last word.
The credits sequence slyly sets up the mystery as a gloved hand constructs a miniature room, subsequently revealed to be the room where the 4 mathematicians will be trapped. There's something unnerving about the sequence and it prepares us for the mystery to come: who? why? In fact, most of the first half masterfully succeeds in misdirecting both characters and audience about precisely these questions. One of the mathematicians appears to be the obvious target while another the equally obvious mastermind, but this is a film that enjoys playing games and nothing should be taken at face value.
The pseudonyms the characters adopt might be those of mathematicians, and the puzzles might be mathematical in nature, but the narrative is never ponderous. It's a smart film that wears it's cleverness lightly. If anything, the film is perhaps just a little too frenetic, especially during the denouement when the revelations come thick and fast and it's difficult to work out just what's truth and what's a lie. The initial question appears to be what links the 4 characters with the mysterious "Fermat" but it turns out it's not as simple as that. Inconsequential events have huge importance with the advantage of hindsight and it's the ability to correctly interpret them that proves vital. In that regard, it's natural that it should be "Pascal" (inventor of a popcorn-spouting duck, who initially struggled to solve to entrance puzzle and is battling with a drink problem) who can see most clearly. His practical mind hones in on the essentials at important moments - he's the one who first notices the walls closing in, as well as working out who's responsible. You can practically see him thinking things through. In many ways, he's the most sympathetic of the characters, with his self-inflicted penance for one tragic mistake. Only "Fermat" has a similar poignancy. The others are far too obsessed with the appeal of mathematics and fame (the true reason for their predicament) to connect in the same way. It's therefore satisfying that it's "Pascal" who has the last word.
Monday, 22 June 2009
Sunshine Cleaning
Another Sundance favourite, another quirky indie-by-numbers. Dysfunctional family: check. Life lessons learned through adversity: check. Alan Arkin as a loveable curmudgeon: check. In fact, any film labelled "quirky" should be treated with kid gloves these days. The premise itself sounds like things could actually be inventive and entertaining - sisters set up as crime scene cleaners - but alas cutesy wins out over anything more gritty. There's the seriously annoying son of one sister. I think he's supposed to be adorably troubled but personally I just wanted to slap him. Then there's the cringe-inducing use of a CB radio as a way of talking to the dead. If only iy had had the nerve to be a full-on black comedy, it could have been so much better.
Julius Caesar: RSC
The Courtyard Theatre might be a lovely theatre in it's own right but I always have trouble hearing the actors whenever I sit in the stalls. Somehow, the sound gets lost under the galleries above. True to form, I spent a lot of the first half straining to hear what Brutus was saying, particularly when he was facing away from my section of the stalls. Luckily as the play progresses, passions are raised, voices get louder and audibility is no longer a problem. Julius Ceasar is one of those plays that improves as it goes along, especially once it reaches the assassination itself. Up until then it tends to be rather static and talky, but after that point, the conspirators find their plans unravelling and are outwitted by the seemingly buffoonish Mark Antony. There may be suggestions of the indolence and luxury to come in Antony and Cleopatra, but Cassius was right in wanting him removed. He's still a first class orator and a sharp political operator, fuelled by a sense of righteous vengeance. Brutus on the other hand proves to be disastrously naive. Video projection makes the bare stage seem more populous than it is and gives a sense of Rome's bustling crowds, appealed to by both factions. Sam Troughton's Brutus comes into his own in the latter half of the play as events spiral out of his control. The scene where he relates news of his wife's death shows the Stoic desperately suppressing overwhelming emotion. It's a great scene with Cassius, who ends up more sympathetic than usual, and his death feels genuinely tragic. Mark Antony, Lepidus and Octavius meanwhile show signs of the future cracks in ther alliance, yet these men can still mourn Brutus for his honour and nobility.
The Girl Cut In Two
It's been a long time since Claude Chabrol made a truly great film, and the wait continues. He's impressively prolific for a pensioner and his films are invariably well made and erudite - in this one, the characters quote at each other endlessly - yet they rarely leave much impression. To compound matters further, his latest has also succumbed to the French obsession with May-December romances i.e. attractive young women bafflingly finding men old enough to be their fathers totally irresistible. In fact, neither suitor to our heroine is particularly appealing. The elder is basically a heartless decadent womaniser (bizarrely tolerated and adored by his wife - only a man could have made this film) while the younger, although wealthy, is obviously deeply unstable . It all becomes rather tiresome rather quickly and then just when it seems it should end, it contrives to trundle along for yet another 20 minutes ...
Tuesday, 9 June 2009
The Hangover
This isn't normally the sort of film that I'd go to see at the cinema, although I'd probably catch up with i on TV several years down the line. However, a free ticket can tempt me to the most unlikely things and in this case, I'm extremely pleased that it did. I can't remember the last time that I laughed so much at the cinema. The premise (a bachelor party gone wrong) may sound like it's a typical blokes' film but the preview audience had a good proportion of females and they certainly enjoyed it every bit as much as the men. The key difference between The Hangover and the usual gross-out comedies inflicted on the audience is that some effort has actually been put into developing the characters and creating a plot that engages the viewer. In it's own oddball way, it all makes sense!
After the initial setup - old friends Phil and Stu and future brother-in-law Alan take Doug to Vegas for his bachelor party - the film jumps to the aftermath of the evening. There's a tiger in the bathroom, a baby in the closet, a chicken roaming around - and no Doug. Noone can remember anything; Stu (henpecked by his girlfriend and constantly announcing himself as a doctor only to be undercut by the others' revealing he's a dentist) has a tooth missing; Phil (capable of talking himself into and out of anything) has a hospital wristband; and Alan is just as weird as he was before - and it turns out that it's all his fault. Let's just say it involves the world's worst drug dealer and the purchase of roofies instead of E. The reason the film works so well is that it functions as a mystery for both the characters and the audience. We're no wiser than the trio about what's happened or why, so every surprise for them is also a surprise for us (instead of the expected Merc being driven to them by the valet, they get a police car; Stu discovers he's now a married man; Chinese gangsters keep trying to attack them; and Mike Tyson is *very* pissed off) There are some wonderful comic setpieces throughout, some going the obvious route and others heading off in very strange directions. It's not just the physical comedy, although the sight of grown men being tasered at a class demonstration or dealing with a tiger waking up in their car is inherently funny. There are some hilarious dialogue exchanges too, mostly arising naturally from the situation rather than being shoehorned in because it's a funny line. As the search progresses, the trio get increasingly cut and bruised, not to say outright humiliated, and there's a very nifty bit of misdirection about Doug that wrongfoots cast and viewer. The laughs come constantly which is exactly what you want from a comedy.
But I'm still not sure how the chicken got there ...
After the initial setup - old friends Phil and Stu and future brother-in-law Alan take Doug to Vegas for his bachelor party - the film jumps to the aftermath of the evening. There's a tiger in the bathroom, a baby in the closet, a chicken roaming around - and no Doug. Noone can remember anything; Stu (henpecked by his girlfriend and constantly announcing himself as a doctor only to be undercut by the others' revealing he's a dentist) has a tooth missing; Phil (capable of talking himself into and out of anything) has a hospital wristband; and Alan is just as weird as he was before - and it turns out that it's all his fault. Let's just say it involves the world's worst drug dealer and the purchase of roofies instead of E. The reason the film works so well is that it functions as a mystery for both the characters and the audience. We're no wiser than the trio about what's happened or why, so every surprise for them is also a surprise for us (instead of the expected Merc being driven to them by the valet, they get a police car; Stu discovers he's now a married man; Chinese gangsters keep trying to attack them; and Mike Tyson is *very* pissed off) There are some wonderful comic setpieces throughout, some going the obvious route and others heading off in very strange directions. It's not just the physical comedy, although the sight of grown men being tasered at a class demonstration or dealing with a tiger waking up in their car is inherently funny. There are some hilarious dialogue exchanges too, mostly arising naturally from the situation rather than being shoehorned in because it's a funny line. As the search progresses, the trio get increasingly cut and bruised, not to say outright humiliated, and there's a very nifty bit of misdirection about Doug that wrongfoots cast and viewer. The laughs come constantly which is exactly what you want from a comedy.
But I'm still not sure how the chicken got there ...
Monday, 8 June 2009
Looking for Eric
A lot of people seem to dismiss Ken Loach as a maker of dour socialist polemics. These people are usually British (the French sensibly adore him) and have obviously not seen any of his films recently. Yes, he can do passionately political (Land and Freedom, The Wind That Shakes The Barley, Carla's Song) but what he can also do brilliantly is an earthy humour that thrives among society's have-nots, that binds together friends and family and that gets them through the hard times. In his very best recent work, such as Riff-Raff, Raining Stones and My Name is Joe, the humour and the politics are inextricably entwined, drawing the viewer into the story via a genuine interest in the characters' lives.
Looking for Eric has plenty of humour but also a darker side, as we see how a life can sometimes spiral out of control before a person realizes what's happening. As far as the humour is concerned, not only do we have the (possibly marijuana-induced) appearance of Eric Cantona - a most unlikely saviour if ever there was one - into Eric Bishop's life, dispensing enigmatic bon mots in order to get him back on the right track, but there's also the loveable bunch of fellow posties determined to help their friend. The comic highlight is arguably the self-help session set up by Meatballs, which involves all the gang, some more sceptical than others. Meatballs himself takes these things *very* seriously, which can't be said about all of the group. However, where most films would merely poke fun at this unlikely band engaging in such an activity, there's a delightful surprise as the posties select the person they most admire. While Eric's choice of Cantona is a given, the rest range from Fidel Castro to Gandhi via Nelson Mandela, Sammy Davis and Frank Sinatra) In fact the real theme of the film is summed up by Cantona: "You have to trust your team mates. Always. Otherwise you are lost". It's only through the solidarity of the football fans that Eric can save his stepson from the clutches of a local criminal, but on a more mundane level, his workmates try to cheer him up and worry about him, and the Man Utd fans share a deep camaraderie. People are bound together by family ties, their work, their love for a football team. If you consider this dour polemic, then there's no hope for you.
Looking for Eric has plenty of humour but also a darker side, as we see how a life can sometimes spiral out of control before a person realizes what's happening. As far as the humour is concerned, not only do we have the (possibly marijuana-induced) appearance of Eric Cantona - a most unlikely saviour if ever there was one - into Eric Bishop's life, dispensing enigmatic bon mots in order to get him back on the right track, but there's also the loveable bunch of fellow posties determined to help their friend. The comic highlight is arguably the self-help session set up by Meatballs, which involves all the gang, some more sceptical than others. Meatballs himself takes these things *very* seriously, which can't be said about all of the group. However, where most films would merely poke fun at this unlikely band engaging in such an activity, there's a delightful surprise as the posties select the person they most admire. While Eric's choice of Cantona is a given, the rest range from Fidel Castro to Gandhi via Nelson Mandela, Sammy Davis and Frank Sinatra) In fact the real theme of the film is summed up by Cantona: "You have to trust your team mates. Always. Otherwise you are lost". It's only through the solidarity of the football fans that Eric can save his stepson from the clutches of a local criminal, but on a more mundane level, his workmates try to cheer him up and worry about him, and the Man Utd fans share a deep camaraderie. People are bound together by family ties, their work, their love for a football team. If you consider this dour polemic, then there's no hope for you.
Anything for Her
As soon as the summer blockbusters arrive, a stream of French films arrive in their wake. In the past couple of years, the most impressive have been muscular thrillers. While these might not end up being the best films of the year, they usually have a satisfying grittiness and an equally appealing "ordinary", mature cast. The leading men are those typically French plain-but-actually-handsome actors such as Francois Cluzet or Daniel Auteuil, the kind you would NEVER find as leads in American films. The women are admittedly classier, but with luck might have more to do than simply stand around looking decorative and/or helpless. Anything for Her is no more plausible than, say, Tell No One and Julien likewise gets increasingly battered and bloodied as the film progresses. As the title suggests, this is a man who will do anything to get his suicidal wife out of jail. He becomes increasingly secretive and taciturn; his flat gradually empties of all furniture and belongings; his work is no longer teaching high school students but accumulating the information required to plan the perfect jail break and escape. I can't help but think that the premise would be even more intriguing if Lisa's innocence hadn't been established - at least for the viewer - quite so early. Some of the Julien's family clearly have their doubts about whether she committed the murder but never Julien himself. He believes wholeheartedly in her innocence, hence his extreme actions to free this innocent woman. If there had been doubt in the mind of the audience, the steps that he takes, and the lives it costs (which include one riff on a scene from Reservoir Dogs) would have left the viewer feeling deeply uneasy. As it is, there's a sense that his actions are all ultimately justified.
Monday, 1 June 2009
Blue Eyelids
Romances don't get more low-key than this. Marina and Victor may end up together but it's not exactly optimistic. They seem to have very little in common apart from their loneliness. Conversations are punctuated by agonizing silences or repeated exchanges. Victor constantly asks about their fellow students but Marina can't remember any of them, not even him. Victor though recognizes her immediately although he comments that she seemed much happier back then. There's no obvious reason why either character should be as isolated as they are. Both are presentable, if poor, but Marina in particular seems crippled by shyness. Desperation rather than attraction prompts her to phone Victor after their initial meeting. You just know that if her sister had agreed to accompany her on the prize holiday, she never would have called him. Victor meanwhile does seem to be genuinely attracted to her despite her lack of much personality. They might have hopes that life will resemble the overblown romantic film they watch together but instead it's rife with disappointments: being ejected from a good table at a bar; a picnic that descends into uncomfortable silence; unsatisfactory sex. Nevertheless, Victor's anger at being stood up for the holiday is shortlived while a repentant Marina wishes she'd had his company. The jump from a reconciliation to an immediate proposal of marriage is both ridiculous (logic says it can't last) and somehow touching (maybe at last they've finally connected with another person) Maybe it is, after all, a happy ending.
Exhibitions
There are some exquisite items on display in the Shah 'Abbas exhibition. The calligraphy and manuscripts are as beautiful as any Western illuminated manuscript. The style might be different but the colour, the finely painted flora and the attention to detail are as aesthetically stunning. Oddly, some of the most lovely items are metallic flasks, with their sinuous shapes and Islamic decoration, although some are influenced by Indian art. In fact, not all the exhibits are Iranian. Shah 'Abbas donated works from his own collections to religious institutions and there are early Chinese and Vietnamese ceramics displayed alongside later Iranian items that they influenced. As Iran was at the centre of trade routes passing East to West, it's not surprising that such influences should occur.
On then to Japanese art. I love landscape and nature prints but have never been quite so fond of those featuring the human figure. However, among Kuniyoshi's warriors, geishas and actors there is a wealth of energy and imagination. Famous warriors fight mythical beasts, actors appear in their famous roles and, as a way of circumventing censorship, animals adopt human guise. Several prints are even in the triptych format. The joins might be obvious and the colour might vary across the 3 sheets but it provides a different overall effect to the usual single sheet print. It doesn't just lend itself to epic subject matter either. It works just as well for portraits of women at work or play. There are also humorous prints to outwit the censors, with octopi behaving as humans and a pleasure district populated by sparrows. The playfulness is what sticks in the mind rather than the belligerent heroes.
On then to Japanese art. I love landscape and nature prints but have never been quite so fond of those featuring the human figure. However, among Kuniyoshi's warriors, geishas and actors there is a wealth of energy and imagination. Famous warriors fight mythical beasts, actors appear in their famous roles and, as a way of circumventing censorship, animals adopt human guise. Several prints are even in the triptych format. The joins might be obvious and the colour might vary across the 3 sheets but it provides a different overall effect to the usual single sheet print. It doesn't just lend itself to epic subject matter either. It works just as well for portraits of women at work or play. There are also humorous prints to outwit the censors, with octopi behaving as humans and a pleasure district populated by sparrows. The playfulness is what sticks in the mind rather than the belligerent heroes.
Encounters at the End of the World
Early on, Werner Herzog announces that his documentary won't feature "fluffy penguins" - and let's be honest, cute critters and Herzog don't really go together. In fact, he seems far more interested in the eclectic bunch of humans who inhabit McMurdo Station. Not the Station itself though, which Herzog despairingly describes as resembling a mining town. One senses the final straw is the presence of an ATM. Herzog can't wait to leave "civilization" and head out in to the wilderness, albeit a wilderness dotted with assorted scientists. Surprisingly few animals appear: some enderaingly fat, indolent seals, unperturbed by the humans surrounding them; multicoloured, wierd and wonderful marine life under the ice; and yes, penguins. Not fluffy penguins, but penguins nonetheless, although Herzog being Herzog hones in on the one little chap who hesitates before waddling off in the opposite direction to his fellow penguins, towards certain death. The taciturn penguin specialist (who clearly prefers the company of penguins to humans) finds himself on the receiving end of some typically Herzog questioning: are penguins gay? (there are threesomes apparently); do they go insane? (unclear) The backstories of the McMurdo humans are every bit as bizarre. Herzog is fascinated by what has driven former bankers and PhD students to abandon their careers and head to the ends of the earth. Many would fit perfectly into any of his fiction films. He also captures some gloriously surreal moments, such as the whiteout training that involves a group of newcomers bumbling around with white buckets on their heads or the guitar-playing biologists rehearsing on a roof or the recording of seals under the ice sounding just like 1970s avant-garde electronica. Only Herzog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)